
The best in the end
Jaroslav Dušek and his co-actors have bad luck in certain way. Their total improvisation is a formation not graspable from theatre critics point of view, so that Vizita is, even if, written about as phenomen, while particular concrete performations irrevocably disappear in oblivion. And despite a consciousness of certain foolness of this doing I feel a need to remind one of these concrete performations of Jaroslav Dušek and Pjér Lašéz, the one which was performed as Harphenist kidnapping at Archa Theatre on the 5th of October and was the most pleasant experience of new season (and the best performed during the last five-year-plan as well - at least from those I have seen).
This time Vizita really played about a harphenist (for not insiders: it would be very naive to presume what will be played on the stage according to a title of the performance). There is no point in making fool of myself by trying to reproduce a story of a harphenist with a heart in open hands suffering, among other problems, from oidipus problems and unfullfilled desire to become an accountant. It is quite impossible but that not what is going on here; who has ever seen Vizita knows what I am speaking about. What is admirable at all cases is at least an ability to make up a story, though absurd and spreading, but consistent and closed and at the same time to gloss it, burlesque it and amend it with songs (also improvisied). However traditional base of performances - and the thing that really makes Vizita - is developing and wrapping the story by using associative jumps and surprising logic flip-flops: triad harfeník - harfena - Harapes with following shift to balet be presented - as one of many - especially becouse of its brevity and rememberity(????). Near to Dušek, Pjér Lašéz enforced himself more this time than usually with direct and rawer (???) patches (however he handled especially with music accompaniment, but in Harphenist hijack extraordinary important according to musical approach).
On usual habits this time Jaroslav Dušek antagonized an audience to participation straight -off at the begining - and then he showed phenomenal balance between verbal pulling-in spectators in play and amusing ruling optional tries of disturbing exhibition. He had got good luck. Even the most active volunteer co-operator, "mr. Šimpl" from the first row was containing himself: his striped jacket was shown at least ten times, but he did not enforced himself strong enough to break really the performance.
And in the end: th eperformace was sold out. I hope, that longing increasing interest on Vizita is a result of its unique creation above all, not only personal "visualization" of Jaroslav Dušek through taking part in problematic, but publicly much more accepted projects as Pelíšky.
Vladimír Mikulka, Divadelní noviny, 2. 11. 1999